To be "in love" is weird - it is physiologically an unnormal state - adrenalin flowing, not to be able to sleep etc. - it is unnormal. And it is sociologically dangerous - Vonnegut's "a nation of two" - ever wondered why it is so impaortant to go trought all the steps of the bourgeoisly proper lane - dating, infatuation, marriage, children ... truly "being in love" is completely different, it is potentially a very revolutionary state of being - just read Romeo&Juliet and think... love is a formidable and a fearful force...
You sometimes sound like a politician... No harm, it is legal.
Love,love... yes, let us see... Do we have the sociopotitical announcement ready? Good, very good... Now let's see... Oh yes, here it is: We are in favour of all feelings that are attributed with the name of "love"... Love is our main theme...
Yes, Remf, I know I sound like a a politician and I know also why. It's because I don't know what to think about anything.
In principal I'm in favour for all the feelings that are attributed with the name of love, but in practise maybe not. That's the difficulty of being. For me.
HPY, I can agree with that. Or at least they think it's love at first, but is it? If it's another need?
13 comments:
How lovely! You must be in love?
Hahhah, Remf, I'm always in love <3
Always in love? That's unhealthy, physically I mean.
Ever read Francesco Alberoni on the subject? Recommended.
Never read.
Physically unhealthy? Weird.
To be "in love" is weird - it is physiologically an unnormal state - adrenalin flowing, not to be able to sleep etc. - it is unnormal. And it is sociologically dangerous - Vonnegut's "a nation of two" - ever wondered why it is so impaortant to go trought all the steps of the bourgeoisly proper lane - dating, infatuation, marriage, children ... truly "being in love" is completely different, it is potentially a very revolutionary state of being - just read Romeo&Juliet and think... love is a formidable and a fearful force...
It's unnatural and you must get very tired, if you're in love all the time. No sleep and poor with food -tough for the body, the mind also.
Luckily marriage and children come along.
Rome&Juliet...was it love? Or were they just dependant on each other? Is that the demand of being truly in love? Can't live without the other one?
You sometimes sound like a politician... No harm, it is legal.
Love,love... yes, let us see... Do we have the sociopotitical announcement ready? Good, very good... Now let's see... Oh yes, here it is: We are in favour of all feelings that are attributed with the name of "love"... Love is our main theme...
Many people end up in hell because of what they think is love.
Yes, Remf, I know I sound like a a politician and I know also why. It's because I don't know what to think about anything.
In principal I'm in favour for all the feelings that are attributed with the name of love, but in practise maybe not.
That's the difficulty of being. For me.
HPY, I can agree with that. Or at least they think it's love at first, but is it? If it's another need?
I was there once. Or twice;)
But you got out of there, Salka...?
I love you! Dont forget this kind of words!
You're right, Hogrelius. Those are important words. Often forgotten when times go by.
Post a Comment